[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] Updated Scenarios
Blake Thanks for doing a great job on the scenarios. I have a few suggestions and questions regarding this latest draft: 1. In section 4.4, scenario 2 for encryption, maybe indicate that a fault is returned if there is a decryption failure (as noted later in 4.5.3): "If there is a decryption failure a fault is returned as outlined in 4.5.3." 2. Line 398, replace "referenced by the signature" with "referenced by the EncryptedKey security token reference". There is no signature. 3. Clarify that full URLs are required when transforms are used, perhaps at line 128 add "This text references transforms using the notation #Transform-name but when used in messages the full transform URL should be used." This may clarify the intent at lines 414,423,646,939,948,957,964. 5. Line 681, capitalize NOT? 6. Should the base64 transform be removed from the example on line 767-768, since the Content-Transfer-Encoding is base64? 7. Typo at 861, s/identifiers/identifies/ 8. 862 s/contrasts/differs from/ 9. 1156, SwA profile reference should be draft 12. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/download.php/9752/wss-s wa-profile-1.0-draft-12.pdf Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia -----Original Message----- From: ext Blake Dournaee [mailto:blake@sarvega.com] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:31 PM To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wss] Updated Scenarios All - Contains corrections to the examples based on the base64 discussion. Blake
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]