Re: [wss] proposal for issue 250: add optional TokenType

[NISHIMURA Toshihiro <nishimura.toshi@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Ron's current proposal shows:
| /wsse:SecurityTokenReference/@wsse:TokenType

I think we should change this as follows:
| /wsse:SecurityTokenReference/@wsse11:TokenType

Right?
---
Toshi

At Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:14:29 -0800,
DeMartini, Thomas wrote:
> Per our action from the last call, Ron and I discussed offline to see if
> there was a proposal we could reach consensus on for the next call.  We
> decided to put two options forward for the TC to consider.
> 
> Option 1: Close Issue 250 with no action.
> Option 2: Close Issue 250 according to Ron's email
> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200501/msg00020.html).
> 
> We think that each member of the TC needs to weigh the advantages of
> having 1.1 more closely resembling 1.0 (Option 1) against the advantages
> of having all 1.1 token referencing forms more closely resembling each
> other (Option 2).  Once each member has determined which set of
> advantages are most important to them, the TC can have a vote at the Feb
> 8th call to determine which set of advantages are most important to the
> TC.
> 
> &Thomas.