[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml-comment] Conformance tests
Frederic, > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederic Deleon [mailto:frederic.deleon@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:48 AM > To: Kuketayev, Argyn (Contractor) > Cc: xacml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; Virginie PRIE > Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] Conformance tests > > Hi, > > We passed conformance tests you defined. > It was globally correct for us. Which version of conformance tests are you refering to? The matter is that, I've found a couple of bugs in a few tests, but didn't have time to update the test suite yet. > However, 4 files were not valid for us: IID029Policy2.xml, > IID030Policy2.xml, IIE001PolicySetId1.xml and IIE002PolicySetId1.xml. > From our point of view, these files do not satisfy the XACML schema. > Indeed, they contain a Condition element with "FunctionId" > attribute and "AttributeValue" sub-element. Thanks for reporting these tests. I'll look at them. Thanks, Argyn
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]