[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] Add <Rule> evaluation description
Yes, I think you are right. Thanks for pointing this out. Regards, Erik xiaofeng03 wrote: >Dear XACML CommitteeŁ¬ > >I have some comments about XACML Administrative Policy draft. > >In last comment, I said the specification should add <Rule> evaluation description. Now, I realize it must be added to the specification, otherwise it will not complete. For example, given a administrative request, there are two rules, A and B. The effect of A is deny and the effect of B is permit. If the administrtive request satisfy the constraints of A and B. Because the specification can't support negative administriave policies, the A's result should be discarded. > > >Best Regards > >Li XiaoFeng >Email:xiaofeng03 (at) iscas (dot) cn lxf (at) is (dot) iscas (dot) ac (dot) cn >Department:LOIS,Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences >Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing,P.R. CHINA > >2006-07-28 > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]