[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml-comment] XACML standard
I understand the motivation, but almost all implementations of it have terrible documentation, some are not even free and the free ones don’t even work as described in the documentation. AuthzForce documentation is horrible, for example. I tried to install and use it, but my Eclipse IDE just doesn’t recognize its classes and functions. Ws02 server doesn’t give the correct responses to the requests against the policies I used, and it’s not free. The other implementations like Balana or SunXACML are either abandoned, or only support 2.0. All this makes me wonder why this standard exists. I don’t want to waste my time learning it anymore. Sagar From: rich levinson Hi Sagar, On 12/19/2017 1:14 PM, Sagar Limaye wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]