OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: Attribute Array in JSON Request

Hi David,

On 10/02/2018 12:23 AM, David Brossard wrote:

In retrospect, I think I probably forgot. The profile is inconsistent in how I handle arrays. That said, now that I attempted to write a swagger definition, I realize that shortcuts like allowing an array to be a single-valued object does not save you much and makes your code much harder.

I and others in the TC agree. The extra code complexity isn't worth it to save a
couple of octets here and there. Also, a future work item for the TC is a JSON
profile for XACML policies and policy sets which would share a number of
constructs with the JSON profile for the protocol. We would want to make the
implementation easier by not having any options to output an object instead of an
array of one object, but it would be messy if the protocol still allowed it.

Consequently, the TC is proposing to remove from the JSON profile all the cases
where the implementer is given the option to use an object instead of an array
with only one object. Unless you particularly wanted to do it, Hal and I will take
care of these edits for the JSON profile.

To maximize interoperability, those of us with an existing implementation should
stop using the option to send an object instead of an array as soon as it is
practical to do so, but continue to accept a single object where an array is
expected. Implementations of the revised JSON profile would not be expected to use
or accept that option.

We will also need new statements of use, which strictly speaking should be from
implementations that don't ever send an object in place of an array.

We will be starting the edits in a few days, so if anyone has concerns they should
voice them now.

Did anyone get a chance to try the swagger I wrote?

I haven't tried it.



On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Steven Legg <steven.legg@viewds.com <mailto:steven.legg@viewds.com>> wrote:

    Hi David,

    Cyril's review comments on the JSON profile call out the Attribute field in
    the Action object in the example request in Section 8.1 as being in error because
    it is not an array of objects. I'm not so sure that is the error. You have various
    cases where fields that may take multiple values may be represented as a single
    object instead of an array containing a single object. Did you intend that this
    rule should also apply to the Attribute field but didn't make it explicit, or
    did you intend that the Attribute field always be an array?


David Brossard
VP of Customer Relations
+1 312 774-9163
+1 502 922 6538
+46(0)760 25 85 75

Axiomatics | 525 W. Monroe Suite 2310 | Chicago 60661 <https://maps.google.com/?q=525+W.+Monroe+Suite+2310+%7C+Chicago+60661&entry=gmail&source=g>
Support: https://support.axiomatics.com <https://support.axiomatics.com/>
Web: http://www.axiomatics.com <http://www.axiomatics.com/>
Axiomatics Blog <http://www.axiomatics.com/blog/> | Events <http://www.axiomatics.com/events.html> | Resources, Webinars & Whitepapers <http://www.axiomatics.com/resources.html>
Connect with us on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/companies/536082> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/axiomatics> | Google + <https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/101496487994084529291/> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/axiomatics> | YouTube <http://www.youtube.com/user/axiomaticsab>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]