Subject: Re: [xacml-users] Policy for Conformance Test IIC008 issue?
> > It's interesting that this is in the tests at all. The "convicted felon" > case is one of the connonical examples for negative rules. We're very > careful in XACML not to support negative policy easily, because it has > many problems. I'll be curious to hear who created this test, and what > the intended behavior is. > Seth I'd like to know what is "negative rule" in XACML and the problems associated with it. thanks, Argyn