[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Groups vs. Roles
Hi > "A role is thus a special case of a group, in which all the policies have > the same subject." ????? i am not sure i understand this...... > This would imply that although roles are useful, one never has to reference > a role from a policy. One can simply reference the group which has a one to > one mapping with the named role. This is not inconsistent with my first > statement: i'm not sure ...... roles are dynamic by nature and can be activated and released. -p
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC