[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [Use Case:] PFC
actually, i was using it the context of 'dulling down' or 'lessening' the purely technical elements of the flow description by accommodating sociopolitical factors. i will change it to 'non-technical factors' to make it more clear for everyone. b Hal Lockhart wrote: > > Looks ok to me. Only comment I have is that you have misused the word > "Mitigating". Perhaps you call call this "non-technical factors". > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bill parducci [mailto:bill@parducci.net] > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:00 PM > > To: xacml > > Subject: [Use Case:] PFC > > > > > > i am sending out a Plea For Comments with the hope that this will spur > > review of the use case template that i submitted last week. my goal is > > to have this thing 'ready' by friday so that the use case owners can > > began transposing their respective information. > > > > thanks > > > > b > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xacml-request@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xacml-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC