[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [glossary] 'no subject'
kinda what i was shooting for... :o) b "PATO,JOE (HP-PaloAlto,ex1)" wrote: > > I agree that the "subject" of an authorization action need not be a user - > and did not read the SAML definition to restrict in this way (the example > clause was illustrative not restrictive). Nonetheless, we should clear up > the definition so that there is no question that we can use attributes to > identify the subject rather than assuming that identity is the sole > determinant. > > - joe
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC