Re: [xacml] Glossary Follow on

[bill parducci <bill@parducci.net>]

+1 

i think that this would be an excellent idea

b

> Tim Moses wrote:
> 
> Colleagues - My preference is to update the glossary, have a round of
> email discussion then finish off with a telecon.  I would be willing
> to take a shot at the update, if that is acceptable to the group.  I
> know that Hal and I have disagreed over definitions (privilege and
> capability), so I'm sure he'll want to keep a close eye on my work
> ;-).  Also, being a typical male, I am shy of long-term commitment.
> So, my offer (subject to extension at my discretion) is for the
> current update.  What do people think?  My plan would be to pare down
> the glossary to just those terms that are directly relevant to our
> domain model and its (as yet) unexplored interior, choosing a single
> word where there are a number of candidates.
> 
> All the best.  Tim.
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Tim Moses
> Tel: 613.270.3183
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:31 AM
> To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xacml] Glossary Follow on
> 
> It was not clear if the lack of attendance at the last call on the
> glossary
> was because of the time or lack of interest.
> 
> To make further progress, we could:
> 
> 1. Get a volunteer to draft a new version.
> 2. Hold another telecon
> 
> If #2 is chosen, we need to know exactly who is going to attend, since
> it is
> difficult to find a time that is convenient for both west coast and
> far
> east.
> 
> Hal
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>