[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xacml] [glossary] target
here is a snippet from a discussion that tim moses and i were having. wanted to get it onto the list for discussion: in the glossary discussions it *seems* that the term 'target' is being used as a noun. if so, then we have the following [reasonable] choices to select from: target a : a mark to shoot at b : a target marked by shots fired at it c : something or someone fired at or marked for attack d : a goal to be achieved i think that 'd:' is clearly the definition that is most applicable here. assuming this is the case, how does a rule become a 'goal to be achieved'? the requester doesn't see the rule in it's universe -- that is an artifact of determining access -- not a goal in that frame of reference. if we move the frame of reference to the PEP, only the policy decision, requester and requested resource are included. from the point of the PDP rules, requester, requested resource all are involved, however the goal is successful determination of policy decision. make sense? b
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC