[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xacml] Minutes of policy model subcommittee 18 March 2002
Present: Anne Anderson, Ernesto Damiani, Carlisle Adams, Tim Moses. 1. Although we did not have a quorum, we recommended approval of the Anne's proposed resolutions to PM-1-01-A, PM-1-05, PM-1-07, PM-2-01, PM-3-03, and PM-3-03-A with the following minor changes. We expect a formal vote to occur at the next meeting where a quorum is present. New issue: Shall XACML mandatory-to-implement combiner algorithms be described using some sort of formal language or pseudo-code? If so, what syntax shall we use? Anne, Ernesto, Carlisle, and Tim recommended that some sort of pseudo-code be used. Java was suggested. Ernesto offered to research various standard pseudo-codes and make a recommendation. Champion: Ernesto. PM-1-07: [Move the clause about descriptive text to follow the description of how users define algorithms, since the presumption is that our mandatory-to-implement algorithms will be described using pseudo-code of some sort.] The combiner algorithm to be used by a given <policyStatement> or <policyCombinationStatement> is specified using a URI. XACML will specify a small set of mandatory-to-implement combiner algorithms. Users are free to define other algorithms (which MAY be defined using descriptive text), although not all XACML-compliant PDPs will be able to apply them. PM-3-03: [Move mention of universal targets to follow the basic definition of use of target so it is not seen as either...or] A given PDP uses a single <policyCombinationStatement> or <policyStatement> as the root of its evaluation. The <target> element of this base policy specifies the set of resources, subjects, and actions that this PDP is prepared to handle. This <target> element MAY be universal (allSubjects, allResources, allActions). A PDP returns NOT-APPLICABLE if a request does not match the <target> in its base policy. 2. Tim reports that he has a valid schema and examples for Version 11. He is now going through the minutes of the face-to-face to make sure he has picked up all the changes. Version 11 includes a proposal for arithmetic expressions that Tim circulated among the "arithmetic expressions subcommittee" (Ernesto, Simon, Michiharu). 3. [ACTION-All] Champions should move to resolve and close formally (with vote) all policy model-related issues as soon as possible. This will allow the committee to focus on XML syntax issues. 4. [ACTION-Carlisle] Carlisle will announce that the TC has resolved most model issues and is now concentrating on XML syntax issues. This announcement may pull in a slightly different set of participants, who are more XML-savvy. Carlisle will talk to Pierangela about whether she wants to continue as the Monday subcommittee chair. 5. Pierangela and Ernesto are willing and able to host the next Face-to-Face meeting at the University of Milan in Milan, Italy. The tentative dates are April 22-23, 2002. These dates allow Pierangela and Ernesto the most flexibility in scheduling around their classes, and a Monday start allows attendees to get Saturday stay-over fare reductions. 6. [ACTION-Carlisle] Carlisle will be attending the IETF on Thursday March 21, so may not be able to call in. He will talk to Hal about being prepared to chair the meeting. Anne -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC