[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] [batch #2] counter proposal to 3-04
OCL is a great idea. good call. b On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 06:59, Beznosov, Konstantin wrote: > I tend to agree with Bill's point that the language should not be > vendor-specific. This is especially important if we want this standard > be ever supported across the industry. > > However, I'm not sure how much we can leverage a specific programming > language without getting trapped into the problem of providing > compilable code. Isn't it better to use some formal, such as Z or OCL, > language for such things? See > http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rej99/suprema/examples_main.htm for an example. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC