Re: [xacml] [CR] AttributeSelectorIndirect

[bill parducci <bill.parducci@overxeer.com>]

Polar Humenn wrote:

 > This approach requires "node-match" to be polymorphic and for XACML
 > processors to understand abstract data types. Our simple type system
 > cannot support it. We would now have much more than primitive types,
 > and sequences of primitive types.  We would have abstract data types
 > (i.e. arbitrary XML nodes) introduced into the type system.

i agree. this opens the door for even more comparison issues (does 
equality mean same object reference? instance? value? etc.)

i too prefer michiharu's initial proposal (string match).

b