[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] functions specifications
That's fine with me, if it covers all those functions. We should probably label the sections. -Polar On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Daniel Engovatov wrote: > 3.2.7.3 - dateTime comparison and equality > 3.2.8, 3.2.9 - time and date comparison and equality > > Some other data types have references to appropriate RFCs or other W3C > documents > (like 2396 for anyURI, 2054 for base64 binary etc..) > > I think we should just cite this document.. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Polar Humenn [mailto:polar@syr.edu] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:32 AM > To: Daniel Engovatov > Cc: XACML > Subject: RE: [xacml] functions specifications > > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Daniel Engovatov wrote: > > > Some of this is recommended, with appropriate standards cited in this > > document: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ > > Can you point out which ones? > > Thanks, > -Polar > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC