[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] straw poll on "<type>-map" or "map"
> As for the "type-bag", "type-one-and-only", "type-bag-size" functions, I >would be very happy if they were polymorphic as well. The type is pretty >meaningless to their functionality. However, the function "type-is-in" >calls an implicit function "type-equal" to handle the membership >determination. So, it can be said that it is needed. Why would you be happy? Would it make for a simpler, faster and more efficient implementation for a variety of languages and architectures? What is the reason for introducing polymorphic functions beyond it being a "cool" feature? Use case? Sample implementation that we can see, how it useful? Daniel;
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC