[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] WSPL - XACML gap analysis
Seth - OK. We have options here. Preferences don't so much impact the processing of a rule by a PDP, but the processing of a rule by a system creating a request that will not only satisfy the PDP, but satisfy it in its preferred manner. You are right, we could define the existing "or" and "and" functions such that the preferred options occur first in their contents. Or, we could introduce new functions: "orderedOr" and "orderedAnd", and allow the existing "or" and "and" to have the more relaxed semantic. I have no objection to following your suggestion. All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Proctor [mailto:seth.proctor@sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:06 AM To: Tim Moses Cc: 'XACML' Subject: Re: [xacml] WSPL - XACML gap analysis On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:06:55AM -0500, Tim Moses wrote: > [...] > R10 - Needs the reintroduction of orderedOr and orderedAnd functions with an > explanation of their semantics. Tim - I think that the current definiton of "or" and "and" already requires in-order evaluation. Is something more needed for this case? seth ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]