[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: examples in specification
[With everyone at the F2F I don't expect a quick response, but I figured that if things are getting slow, this will give you something to discuss <g>] I've spent the better part of this morning trying to explain how Obligations work. The question came up because of the example in section 4.2.4.3 (Rule 3). In this example, AttributeAssignments contain AttributeSelectors and AttributeDesignators. While this isn't illegal, the example implies something about the specification that isn't true (ie, that the PDP will interpret the contents of assignments), at least as I read the specification. This isn't the first example that has caused confusion. I know all work items were supposed to be submitted before the F2F, but I would like to propose that we review & correct all examples before the 2.0 release. I don't think this is a work item so much as a natural requirement of releasing a major-version revision of a specification, but I haven't heard any discussion on the topic. Thoughts? seth
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]