[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
is the scope of this the entire RC or a specific rule (from which it is evoked)? seems that something important enough to be declared must-be-present should have some sort of context constraint...? b Tim Moses wrote: > Colleagues - If we are to retain the function "present", how about this as a > definition? > > urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present > > This function SHALL take one argument of data-type > "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI" and SHALL return a > "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean". The return value SHALL be > "True" if there exists anywhere in the request context an attribute with an > attributeId attribute whose value is the same as that of the function > argument, according to the > urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:anyURI-equal function. Otherwise, it > SHALL return "False". > > What do you think? > > All the best. Tim.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]