Subject: RE: [xacml] What is the value of <Rule> if <Condition> is absent?
All - Thanks. I had missed the text in 7.8. All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:53 PM To: Tim Moses Cc: 'XACML' Subject: Re: [xacml] What is the value of <Rule> if <Condition> is absent? On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 13:41, Tim Moses wrote: > Colleagues - <Condition> is an optional element of <Rule>, but we > don't specify the value of <Rule> in this case. How about "True"? > All the best. I think that section 7.8 (at least in draft 12) covers this: "The condition value SHALL be 'True' if the <Condition> element is absent, or if it evaluates to 'True'." So, there is always a defined value for the Condition, even if it is absent from the Rule. Are you looking for something more? seth