[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] all-of-any/any-of-all
Seth - Go for it. Please send me the proposed new text. All the best. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Seth Proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 5:44 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: [xacml] all-of-any/any-of-all In a conversation over the weekend, I realized that the english text used in the specification for the all-of-any and any-of-all functions is at best confusing and at worst incorrect. Specifically, the problem is with the word "collectively" which implies that all values from the "all" bag must be evaluated against the same value from the "any" bag. I'm also not sure the description for using the and function (in all-of-any) or the or function (in any-of-all) is correct. I pinged Polar about this, and he (I think) agreed that the text could use some tweaking. Would someone like to agree or disagree on this point? Is it just me? Can someone explain to me how the text about using and/or (the 5th sentence of the 2nd paragraph in both sections) makes sense? If anyone else agrees that this needs work then I'll propose some alternate text. seth To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p hp.