[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] A public comment
Ugg.. There are still some things wrong with this specification. Line 4578 : all_of f a [] = False should be: all_of f a [] = True So, two changes need to be made to the current specification: Line 4578: all_of f a [] = True Line 4738: all_of_all f [] ys = True Cheers, -Polar On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Polar Humenn wrote: > > Haruyuki is right on this issue. It is merely an editorial mistake. but > what do we do about it for voting and approval, etc. > > > Comment from: Haruyuki.Kawabe@unisys.co.jp > > In > http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/access_control-xacml-2_0-core-spec-cd-04.pdf, > the sencond clause of Haskell notation for function all-of-all (line 4738) > should be > all_of_all f [] ys = True > because the third clause (line 4739) conjugates with '&&' and it > terminates with the second. > If the result (right hand side) of the second clause is False, the result > of the third cluase are always False for any bag specified as the second > argument of all_of_all. > (Note: The first argument is a boolean function.) > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]