[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of June 23 2004 XACML TC Meeting
Attendees: Anne Anderson Seth Proctor Bill Parducci (minutes) Tony Nadalin Hal Lockhart Erik Rissanen Ron Williams Argyn Kuketyev David Staggs Daniel Engovatov Quorum reached (8 voting members) Agenda: I. Minutes from May 26, June 9 meetings voted upon: Approved unanimously No objections II. Focus Group Meeting Schedule TC voted to move Focus Group back to original time slot: alternating weeks at the same time (10:00AM ET) and day (Thursday). III. Issues Delegation Review (Draft 06) Erik is looking for feedback on the proposal and will continue to explore the pseudo-code model. Namespace Erratum This topic has been tabled since Tim was not on the call. Community defined sets of Attribute Identifiers Anne suggested that the References document may be used to point adopters to various attribute authorities. Seth feels that getting involved in referencing individual identifiers based on anecdotal usage may create an implicit relationship. Anne and Hal offered that the intent is only to provide a direction for interested parties not for endorsement purposes. Hal proposed that an explicit statement disavowing any endorsement would solve the problem. Seth still maintains concern because he believes that adopters will be looking for the "correct" way to adopt an attribute. A separate section will be created in the Reference document where adopter Attribute Identifiers may be listed. IRI (Internationalized Resource Identifier) Daniel introduced the IRI concept that is being used by the W3C group. He volunteered to take on the task of seeing how this will affect the XACML specfication Conformance Tests Argyn asked about the status of the v2 Conformance Tests and offered to begin porting over the v1 tests. The question was raised as to how these should be hosted during development and the current thinking is to use the XACML document repository until such time as this becomes impractical. IV. Work List The Work List has not been changed significantly. The Chair suggests that the TC members review the Work List. meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]