[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate]
Should we say that it may/should be implementation defined? (I doubt it would make sense to have it set per policy - but some folk love relative uri..) - on the other hand it would be utterly useless for interoperability, so I guess we should live it as is.. Daniel; -----Original Message----- From: seth proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@sun.com] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:48 PM To: Daniel Engovatov Cc: Ron Williams; Anne.Anderson@sun.com; OASIS XACML TC Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate] Daniel Engovatov wrote: > Related question: > > We do not support declaring base-uri property, do we? No, we don't. seth _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]