OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Minutes TC Meeting 31 January 2008

1 Roll Call
   Hal Lockhart (Co-chair)
   Bill Parducci (Co-chair, minutes)
   Erik Rissanen
   Rich Levinson
   Anil Saldhana
   Seth Proctor
   David Staggs
   Anthony Nadalin
   Prateek Mishra
   Anil Saldhana
   Anil Tappetla** (status question)

   Quorum achieved (90% per Kavi)

2 Administrivia
   Hal asked that Obligations be added to the agenda.

   Minutes approved from 17 January 2008 based upon updated version and
   the agreement that the corrections submitted to the list by Erik and
   Rich be incorporated into a new version that Bill will publish.

   The chairs will follow up with Oasis on the current membership status
   of Anil Tappetla.

   Dee posted a link to the list with registration to the IDTtrust
   Symposium. Hal noted that he will attend and encouraged input from
   the TC.

   Erik uploaded a modification to the v2 Errata to address the Xpointer
   issues discussed at the last meeting.

   David asked for information on how to create a Profile (for the work
   being done on the interOp). Hal suggested to begin with the Oasis
   template and create a Draft.

3 Issues

   Context Node of Hierarchical Resources
   Erik briefly reviewed the proposal for HR context nodes posted to  
the list.
   The TC is requested to review and comment.

   Proposal for changed context node for xpaths in 3.0
   Erik proposed a change to context nodes for Xpath usage within the v3
   Draft, noting that there are number of of performance and possibly
   security related issues associated with unbound entry via Xpath.
   Seth and Hal agreed with portions of the proposal. The TC is asked to
   review the proposal in detail in preparation for next week's call.

   Hal asked if Obligation Family needs to be passed back to the PEP to
   address processing attributes and the general consensus is that this
   would be necessary. Erik offered to update the Obligations Draft the
   to reflect this. Erik asked if there was a preference on naming
   types. Hal offered that URNs are consistent with what the spec uses

meeting adjourned.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]