[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes 18 December 2008 TC Meeting
Bill Parducci wrote: > 1. Roll Call > Hal Lockhart (Chair) > Bill Parducci (Co-chair, minutes) > Erik Rissanen > Anthony Nadalin > Rich Levinson > Duane DeCouteau > David Staggs > Anil Saldhana > > Non-voting > John Tolbert > Sean Curran > > Quorum met (88% per Kavi) > > 2. Administrivia > Minutes from 4 December 2008 Meeting > Approved unanimously. > > Hal proposed that the TC meet every week after the first of the > year or extend the existing meetings to 2 hours. There is general > agreement that the TC move to weekly meetings through the delivery > of v3. The next meeting will be 8 January 2009. > > Bill discussed the Oasis Jira/Subversion implementation. TC members > should have received notification of an account being created. Bill > offered to have the issues list moved over on 1/1. > > Duane reviewed the XSPA Profile submission. The document was edited > for some formatting and administrative requirements and submitted. > > 3. Issues > Issue #66: Policy Combining > Rich reviewed the state of the Issue. Erik suggested that we limit > the normative combining algorithms. Tony voiced concern that > introducing a fixed number will limit the implementation flexibility. > > Erik proposed to add the 4 new "extended" combining algorithms be > added to the specification and that the existing algorithms be > marked for future deprecation. There is general agreement to adding > the combining algorithms. The TC needs more time to discuss making > the new algorithms mandatory and if so, whether to mark the existing > combining algorithms as marked for future deprecation. > > Obligations in Rules > There was a discussion on Obligations. There is general agreement to > allow Obligations at the Rule level and introduce a type of > Obligation (Advice?) that may be ignored. Bill raised the concern > that Obligations do not currently have a combining mechanism and > that it is likely that conflicts will arise at the PEP. > > There is general agreement that Obligations be mandatory. Hal > suggested that the TC needs to review what is mandatory/optional in > the specification at a later date. > > Missing Attributes > Erik reviewed the discussion on the list. Hal will post clarified > text. > > meeting adjourned.