xacml message

Subject: CD-1 issue #33: PIP in RFC

From: Erik Rissanen <erik@axiomatics.com>
To: XACML TC <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:22:32 +0200

The issue number refers to the XLS-sheet found in this email:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200909/msg00013.html

The commenter thinks that we should refer to the same RFC for the PIP as 
for the PEP and PDP.

We should not since that RFC does not define a PIP.

I propose that we make no change.

Best regards,
Erik