[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] MAD conceptual model
Tyson, Paul H wrote: > However, there appears to be some motivation for defining it better in > the Policy evaluation model, to allow more predictable xpath > resource-ids to be generated for multiple decision requests, to > facilitate regexp matching. That is, the policy writer would be able to > specify what namespace prefixes will be used, so that rules testing the > string value of the xpath expression can be written without regard to > the namespace binding used in the request. I'm not terribly sympathetic > with this, because I haven't seen a good XACML use case for it. But on > principle, any module that deals with xml namespaces ought to be free to > define its own set of bindings to insulate itself from external changes. > Paul, There are possibilities in XPath to write expressions which do not use namespace prefixes at all. For instance: *[local-name()='Foo'][namespace-uri()='http://example.com/bar'][3] (Pardon me if I got it slightly wrong. My Xpath skills are a bit rusty at the moment.) Best regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]