[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: a first proposal to address issue number 19.
Hi all, Below a first proposal to address issue number 19. Proposal: In the xml use case only, a multiple resource decision
request will have next to the scope attribute an additional attribute called “ urn….:node-type” with values like {element-node, attribute-node, text-node
and maybe for completeness reasons ?comment-node, ? processing-instruction-node?}.
Further (not directly related) comment: In an earlier mail somebody mentioned that it might
make sense to put the derived individual resource-id values in a separate attribute
(e.g. derived-resource-id) and not overriding the original resource-id value. I
am not sure whether this is a good|bad idea but we should kept it in mind and
maybe look for pros and cons of doing this. Best regards jan ________________________________________ Raum: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]