[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] F2F proposed agenda updated
All, Currently the proposed agenda is very "waterfall" formatted. First we do core, then hierarchical, then multiple. I think it would be better to interleave the issues across several iterations. That way I could push out updated working drafts during the days to clear up wording issues, etc, across multiple iterations. I am afraid that a "big bang" attempt to solve the thorny issues are going to take up all the time unless we section them up into smaller pieces which get written down in a working draft for common understanding. Tuesday - December 8 9:00 - 9:15: Roll, administrivia, agenda review 9:15 - 9:30 Discuss process, reqs for Issues 29, 30, 31 9:30 - 10:30 Issues 3, 4 (core): first decisions 10:30 - 10:45 Break 10:45 - 12:00 Issues 11, 16 (Hierarchical): first decisions 12:00 - 1:00 Lunch 1:00 - 2:30 Issues 19, 23, 25, 26, 61 (Multi-resource): first decisions 2:30 - 2:45 Break 2:45 - 5:00 Issue 60 (Profile relationship): first outline 5:00 Recess Wednesday - December 9 8:00 - 8:30 Review & Agenda confirmation 8:30 - 10:30 Issues 3, 4 (core): closing 10:30 - 10:45 Break 10:45 - 12:00 Issues 11, 16 (Hierarchical): closing 12:00 - 1:00 Lunch 1:00 - 2:30 Issues 19, 23, 25, 26, 61 (Multi-resource): closing 2:30 - 2:45 Break 2:45 - 4:30 Issue 60 (Profile relationship): closing 4:30 - 5:00 Planning the next day 5:00 Recess Hopefully we can spend the third day on future work. I hope to be able to prepare new drafts during the night Tu-We or maybe during the daytime breaks. I haven't redone the agenda on the wiki yet. Thought I'll post my proposal here first for some feedback. To prepare, I think it would be good if we all arrive at the F2F with a ready list of current/competing proposals on all the issues so we are all understand the proposals and so we can dig straight in. I will start another thread for calling for enumeration of proposals. I will collect a first version of the list myself. Best regards, Erik On 2009-11-30 14:12, Tyson, Paul H wrote: > I suggest grouping all the xpath-related issues together for discussion > at once. That would cover issues 3, 11, 16, 61, 62, and my recent > proposal that does not have an issue number yet > (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200911/msg00072.html). This > could take several sessions. > > --Paul > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bill parducci [mailto:bill@parducci.net] >> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 09:29 >> To: XACML TC >> Subject: [xacml] F2F proposed agenda updated >> >> I have updated the proposed agenda for the F2F to begin >> assigning time blocks to specific topics. Note that this >> agenda calls for the TC meeting scheduled for December 10th >> to be moved back 1 hour. The idea here is to allow the >> meeting to coincide with the F2F time boundaries and to >> provide a specific point at which official TC business may >> occur (voting, etc.) >> >> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xacml/MeetingAgenda >> >> Please review the agenda and provide comments/suggestions to the list. >> >> thanks >> >> b >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS >> TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your >> TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr >> > oups.php > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]