[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes for 11 February 2010 TC Meeting
Time: 1:00 pm EDT Tel: 513-241-0892 Access Code: 65998 Minutes for 11 February 2010 TC Meeting: 10:00 - 10:05 Roll Call & Approve Minutes: dilli hal rich jan sridhar bill gareth erik david john paul nao we have quorum Approve Minutes: 28 January 2010 TC Meeting http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00065.html hal: approved no objection Adminsitrivia Seth's farewell note: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00068.html Seth will be missed, he made significant contributions OASIS Privacy Webinar: Feb 23: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00053.html Hal: notice was posted to list; sponsored by IdTrust member section V3 Next steps Hal posted email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201002/msg00002.html Core and legacy profiles - awaiting TC Admin to start Public Review Core Administration/delegation Hierarchical request Multiple resource SAML Digital Signature Privacy RBAC XSPA (healthcare) - OASIS Standard Export Compliance - Completed initial public review John: moves to make CD Paul: seconds Hal: no objections Approved by unanimous consent Hal: date should be today (date of vote) Rich: mechanics of the oasis doc update are not obvious (at least to Rich) - ex. what are the doc names and how does that correlate to file names, rev #s etc. Hal: no objections to amending the motion to associate with doc a designated cross ref as defined in oasis process - relate to 3.0 core doc. John: moves to initiate the 15 day public review Rich: seconds Hal: no objections to unanimous consent: approved Hal: scope of public review is limited to the changes that were applied. Hal: need to produce doc in 3 formats try to create html file that has oasis logo in it, but that is fcn of version of word. If logo is separate then need to submit a zip file Intellectual Property - Completed initial public review John: status of ipr profile: in progress, has been thru pub rev; will be ready in couple of weeks. The 2 docs can go separately Other Hal: are people willing to work on these WS-XACML need to see if recent changes have had any impact on existing draft Metadata Erik: use current combining-algorithms, ids, etc. Hal: bias of pdp,pep etc. Policy Distribution (Provisioning) - Hal: plan to edit this; draft soon Obligation Families Hal: there is significant interest; draft seems to meet people's reqts Bill: would like to take up w Erik where left off Bill: there are some reqts on wiki AZ-API - Hal: plan to edit this Attribute Manifest - Hal: plan to edit this; possibly separate doc or combined in ws-xacml Errata - Looking for volunteer we have marked up version of 2.0 w errata applied, but that is probably only starting point Does anyone know of anything else? Hal: there were a couple things at F2F, should be recapped Paul: what was takeaway from w3c workshop? rules area? ontology area? Hal: workshop was not piciing up on the rules or ontology, but were looking for policies for PII (Personal info) need "sticky policies"; when accept data, also accept policies assoc w that data. ex. doc that is not at fixed location; ex. if I get data from you, I have to apply your policies as well as my own, does xacml do it? ex. obligations semantics - aligned w existing obl proposal ex. couple groups interested in multiple pdps - is there chaining etc.? details are in report and papers that were submitted. tried to talk about semantic web, ontologies, feeling was that work of specific vocabularies is domain specific no considerations were given to rdf Paul: enterprises not jumping into ontologies, but will be developing vocabularies in any event. point is: why should everyone re-invent things that have already been laid out in considerable detail Hal: maybe best practice or guidelines Paul: initial wiki page w talking points, observations. as companies develop std ways for bus rules; some level of interoperablility would be useful, possibly translating xacml rules to a std rule format. Status of docs: Erik submission: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00048.html Erik's changelog for review: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00050.html John submitted update for Export Control spec: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00056.html Robin/Hal W3C report on access ctl appl scenarios: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00067.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201002/msg00000.html Issues Determine what issues, if any, remain open for V3. From prev mtgs: Any more discussion on conformance? Robin Cover's W3C reference: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201001/msg00066.html Hal: there was conformance workshop at oasis: jaques durant is person to contact on that. Hal: discussed as relevance to current set of docs; as relates to legacy profile and leave things as they stand in those docs. Next call: march 1, meeting adjourned 1:44PM ET.