OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xacml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xacml] Groups - IPC WD-05 uploaded



I am okay with most of the glossary additions/changes and changes to the descriptive text in the attributes.  I would prefer to keep “Agreement-Designator” instead of “IP-Agreement”, because language granting rights to IP resources often occurs outside an agreement which is solely about IP.  This is another reason why we need a “third-person” way of representing legal agreements in XACML, as you postulated earlier. 


Responding to input from our last meeting, I have started WD-06 with a restructuring of the resource attributes.  I have also included “creator” and “rights” from Dublin Core, and referenced them as such.  I have removed “IP-Type” and “IP-Data”, and substituted Boolean data types for each of the top-level types, and string/date data types for the products of the former IP-Type x IP-Data matrix. 


2.1 Resource Attributes

2.1.1 Copyright  (Boolean)

2.1.2 Copyright-Creator  (String)

2.1.3 Copyright-Registration  (String)

2.1.4 Patent  (Boolean)

2.1.5 Patent-Registration  (String)

2.1.6 Proprietary  (Boolean)

2.1.7 Public-Domain  (Boolean)

2.1.8 Trademark  (Boolean)

2.1.9 IP-Owner  (String)

2.1.10 IP-Designee  (String)

2.1.11 Agreement-Type  (String)

2.1.12 Agreement-Designator  (String)

2.1.13 Rights  (String)

2.1.14 Effective-Date  (Date)

2.1.15 Expiration-Date  (Date)

2.2 Subject Attributes

2.2.1 Organizational-Affiliation  (String)

2.2.2 Affiliation-Type  (String)

2.2.3 Agreement-Designator  (String)


I am interested in additional feedback on the idea of having separate effective/expiration date attributes for copyright, patent, and trademark registrations.


I believe these changes should aid understanding and simplify policy authoring.  I also believe that, while the structure of the profile has changed in the various iterations, the core concepts expressed have remained essentially the same, and that we are reasonably close to finalizing this profile for now.  I do not think we are standardizing too much.  The attribute list reflects a fairly broad and not industry/ country specific interpretation of how access to intellectual property resources can be governed.  Not every IP authorization decision will use every attribute listed.  Furthermore, I know that organizations will need to define additional attributes for their own internal purposes.  This profile establishes a baseline that can promote interoperability and can be used as a framework to advance the common framework for IP authorization decisions.







From: Tyson, Paul H [mailto:PTyson@bellhelicopter.textron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 8:25 AM
To: Tolbert, John W; xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xacml] Groups - IPC WD-05 uploaded


I’m not through making comments, but I wanted to get this out for discussion.  I think we still have a ways to go on this.  My primary concern is not to standardize too much without sufficient motivation or evidence.





From: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xacml@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of John Tolbert
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:27 PM
To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xacml] Groups - IPC WD-05 uploaded


Submitter's message
WD-05 contains sample requests and policies.
-- Mr. John Tolbert

Document Name: IPC WD-05

XACML Intellectual Property Controls profile, working draft 5
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link

Submitter: Mr. John Tolbert
Group: OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC
Folder: Specifications and Working Drafts
Date submitted: 2011-10-14 10:26:53


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]