[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] RE: Target definition
Sounds reasonable. Keep the rules/policies as passive documents and attribute action to the PDP.
Danny Thorpe
Authorization Architect
Dell | Identity & Access Management, Quest Software
Quest Software is now part of Dell.
From: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xacml@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tolbert, John W
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:48 AM
To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xacml] Target definition
On the last call, I said that it was too soon to start working on 4.0. I am holding to that, but have a suggested change for the definition for “target” when the time is right.
3.0--
Target
The set of decision requests, identified by definitions for resource, subject and action that a rule, policy, or policy set is intended to evaluate
Proposed--
Target
The set of decision requests, identified by definitions for resource, subject and action that a PDP is intended to evaluate according to the applicable rule, policy, or policy set
Thoughts?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]