[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Groups - XACML v3.0 Related and Nested Entities Profile Version 1.0 uploaded
I would prefer quantifier-range first, or quantifier-domain second. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Steven Legg [mailto:steven.legg@viewds.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:08 PM To: Tolbert, John W Cc: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xacml] Groups - XACML v3.0 Related and Nested Entities Profile Version 1.0 uploaded On 23/10/2013 2:26 PM, Steven Legg wrote: >> Given that "domain" has fairly standard meaning in IT, would it be possible to use the term "scope" instead? I think it would work in this context, and prevent unnecessary confusion. "Realm" also might be a less-used and less confusing term, but I think "scope" fits best. > > Domain of discourse is what it's called in the terminology of > existential and universal quantification, which I shortened to "domain". Would "domain of discourse" > or "quantifier domain" work for you ? How about "range" (of the quantified variable) ? Regards, Steven
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]