Subject: Re: [xacml] Other profiles?
Excellent. This should make the approval process much more consistent for us. thanks b On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Erik Rissanen <email@example.com> wrote: > Thanks Bill, > > Ok, I submitted template requests for all the old profiles and I'll migrate the content to them. > > I'll number the working drafts based on what was the latest working draft in the past. > > Best regards, > Erik > > On 2013-12-16 17:29, Bill Parducci wrote: >> The most conservative approach is to treat them as Working Drafts. Once they are in a state to promote we can vote to make CSD and promote to Public Review in the same meeting so the level of process to get them to CS status is pretty much the same. I THINK this should reset the public review counter on them as well so each would have a 30 day Public Review. Since many of these have been dormant, I don't think that is a bad idea personally, so I suggest taking that we increment each as a WD and work from there. >> >> b >> >> On Dec 16, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Erik Rissanen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had a look at the status of the other profiles, like multiple decision, saml, etc. I would like to wrap them up, especially the ones like multiple decision and SAML which mean code changes in a PDP. >>> >>> The latest drafts are quite old by now, being from March 2010. I think the technical content is fine (except some typos in the privacy profile I think), we were just doing the core first, and it took a while to be finished and I haven't had so many cycles to spare in the last year or so. >>> >>> However, the OASIS document template has changed, and it appears that even the TC process has changed since then. In the current TC process it says that the approval stages are these: >>> >>> Committee Specification Draft, >>> Committee Specification Public Review Draft, >>> Committee Specification, >>> Candidate OASIS Standard, >>> OASIS Standard, >>> Approved Errata. >>> >>> The profiles are titled "Committee Draft", which I guess corresponds to the first item in the above list. >>> >>> Hal, Bill, anyone, would you know what I should do to move these forward? I was thinking of checking out new document templates and migrating the content to them, and update any references to 3.0 to the final OASIS standard. This would mean that they drop down to working draft again. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Erik >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >