Re: [xacml] Is time-in-range conformant with time-equal?

[Bill Parducci <bill@parducci.net>]

Wouldn't that require the date to answer? Given that they are not equal means there is a range by definition, yes?

b

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:48 PM, Steven Legg <steven.legg@viewds.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The definition of the time-equal function defers to op:time-equal in "XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0
> Functions and Operators", which has the particular example that 08:00:00+09:00 and
> 17:00:00-06:00 are not equal (they are 24 hours apart when considered against a
> fixed date). The definition of the time-in-range function isn't as precise. Is it
> everyone's expectation that
> 
>    time-in-range(08:00:00+09:00, 17:00:00-06:00, 17:00:00-06:00)
> 
> would evaluate to false by similar reasoning?
> 
> Regards,
> Steven
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php