OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xcbf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: [xcbf] SignedData Attributes - DigitalSignature Attributes

Phil Griffin wrote:

> Not at all. I am looking at conforming to cXER for the
> cryptographic payloads in X9.84 and XCBF. 


> All else need
> only be valid XML really, though basing as closely as
> possible to XER would seem to be more simple.

I think you mean well-formed and not valid in that sentence.

But the sentence is not true if you are using ASN.1 as the schema.  The
XML needs to be valid against the ASN.1 schema (using either XER, CXER,
or the more flexible VXER), not just well-formed.

That is what this argument is about.  If you invent random XML, what is
your schema definition?

John L

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC