[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xcbf] GAO Technology Accessment - Biometrics
You may have seen this, as it is old news from way back in the November - December time frame. Well written I think; factual and concise for the most part. Though it fails to mention our XCBF and WSS work, it does speak rather favorably to the design flexibility of the 2001 version of the X9.84 standard (where we started for our schema). But the authors seem confused about the purpose and utility of the X9.84 standard, and see a difference between transport security requirements and formats and those for storage of biometric templates, whereas I do not. They also seem to see a need for other formats for smart card use (which again, I do not). Perhaps they speak more to was is and not to what could or should be. I believe the X9.84 2002 revision offers significant improvements in flexibility over the 2001 version, mainly by building on our XCBF efforts, and extending the possible encodings to XML which better enables web use. But looking at their figures, perhaps the XCBF work fails in ignoring BAPI and should be extended to also map MicroSoft biometric records into our schema. I note that when I helped to start this TC, I was told by several folks involved in the BioAPI work that BAPI was going away and that MicroSoft would soon adopt BioAPI. It is not clear that this has happened from this GAO report. At any rate, good reading, and the following was found at http://www.mail-archive.com/daybook@listserv.gao.gov/msg00151.html 5. Technology Assessment: Using Biometrics for Border Security. GAO-03-174, November 15. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-174 Phil
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC