OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xcbf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: [xcbf] [Fwd: [xcbf-comment] XCBF 1.0 Has Confused Security WithPrivacy]

This message from a member of EPIC was sent to the XCBF public
comment list. I wanted to make sure that all of the XCBF members
had seen this comment.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [xcbf-comment] XCBF 1.0 Has Confused Security With Privacy
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:19:39 -0500
From: Ruchika Agrawal <agrawal@epic.org>
To: xcbf-comment@lists.oasis-open.org

The Electronic Information Privacy Center (EPIC)*, a public interest research center that has extensive expertise in privacy, submits the following comments on the OASIS XML Common Biometric Format (XCBF) 1.0 Committee Specification. 

In submitting our comments, EPIC understands that biometrics entail automated methods of recognizing persons based on physiological or behavioral characteristics; that biometrics are used to recognize the identity of an individual or to verify a claimed identity; that XCBF offers a standard XML schema for biometrics, which describes information that verifies identity based on human characteristics including fingerprints, iris scans, hand geometry, and DNA; and that these XML encodings are based on the ASN.1 schema defined in ANSI X9.84:2003 Biometric Information Management and Security (and therefore respect the X9.96 XML Cryptographic Message Syntax security requirements).

The XCBF 1.0 specification -- while it may respect security standards -- cannot be fairly or accurately described as respecting or achieving privacy.  Technologies or protocols that respect privacy assist in minimizing or eliminating the collection of personally identifiable information.  For example, anonymous remailers allow users to anonymously send emails and post to newsgroups, by not log incoming and outgoing traffic information and stripping email headers of personally identifiable information.  As another example, digital tickets authorize the ticket-holder to perform some action without collecting or transferring personally identifiable information of the ticket-holder. By contrast, techniques that enable the collection of personally identifiable information in the absence of enforceable legal rights or technical safeguards necessarily create a new risk that personal information will be misused.

Security is not tantamount to privacy.  Technologies that respect security may prevent unauthorized parties from gaining access to protected data -- and XCBF 1.0 seems to achieve this goal -- but such standards say nothing about the how the information will be used or whether authorized parties will use information in a way that is detrimental to the interests of the data subject.

Because standardization of biometric data in machine-readable format makes massive and efficient automated data aggregation techniques much simpler, more careful consideration and actual deliberation of privacy safeguards is crucial. None of this is reflected in the current proposal.

        We recommend that the specification be changed to acknowledge that XCBF 1.0 does not respect privacy, and recommend further research into implementing privacy safeguards within the protocol.

Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director
Ruchika Agrawal, IPIOP Science Policy Fellow

*EPIC is a public interest research center in Washington, D.C. that has extensive expertise in privacy.  It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values.  Since its founding, EPIC has participated in extensive agency comment, litigation, and public education to promote privacy and civil liberties.

For more in depth discussions on technologies or protocols that respect privacy, see:

Anonymizer.com; http://www.anonymizer.com/ (visited on October 22, 2002).

Stefan Brands; "A Technical Overview of Digital Credentials"; February 20, 2002; http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/brands02technical.html.

Stefan A.Brands; �Untraceable Off-line Cash in Wallets with Observers�; Advances in Cryptography-CRYPTO �93; Springer-Verlag; 1994; p.302-318.

Herbert Burkert; �Privacy-Enhancing Technologies:  Typology, Critique, Vision�; Technology and Privacy:  The New Landscape edited by Philip Agre and Marc Rotenberg; The MIT Press (Cambridge, 1997).

David Chaum; �Achieving Electronic Privacy�;  Scientific American, August 1992; p. 96-101; http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/mepeirce/Project/Chaum/sciam.html.

David Chaum; "Prepaid Smart Card Techniques: A Brief Introduction and Comparison"; Digicash; 1994; http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/mepeirce/Project/Chaum/cardcom.html.

Roger Clarke; �Roger Clarke's PITs and PETs Resources Site�; http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/PITsPETsRes.html#Orig (visited on October 21, 2002).

Whitfield Diffie and Martin E. Hellman; �New Directions in Cryptography�; IEEE Transactioins on Information Theory;  IT-22(6); November  1976.

Roger Dingledine, Michael J. Freedman, David Molnar; "The Free Haven Project: Distributed Anonymous Storage Service"; December 17, 2000; http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/543510.html.

Simson Garfinkel; PGP:  Pretty Good Privacy; O�Reilly & Associates, Inc. (Sebastopol, 1995).

Simson Garfinkel with Gene Spafford; Web Security, Privacy & Commerce; O�Reilly & Associates, Inc. (Beijing, 2002); Second Edition; p. 262-283.

Simson L. Garfinkel and Abhi Shelat; �Remembrance of Data Passed:  A Study of Disk Sanitization Practices�; IEEE Security & Privacy; January/February 2003.

"Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: The Path to Anonymity"; Volume 1; Joint report by the Dutch Data Protection Authority (RGK) and the Information and Privacy Commissioner for the Province of Ontario, Canada (IPC); August 1995.

Marc Rotenberg, Director of Electronic Privacy Information Center; Hearing on S. 809, The Online Privacy Protection Act of 1999, Before the Subcommittee on Communications Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. Senate; July 27, 1999; www.epic.org/privacy/internet/EPIC_testimony_799.pdf.

Marc Rotenberg, Director of Electronic Privacy Information Center; �Privacy in the Commercial World�; Before the Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, March 1, 2001; http://energycommerce.house.gov/107/hearings/03012001Hearing43/Rotenberg68.htm.

Marc Rotenberg; �A Way Forward for Data Protection:  Privacy Enhancing Technology�; the PARLIAMENT Magazine; September 30, 2002.

Marc Rotenberg, Privacy Law Sourcebook: United States Law, International Law, and Recent Developments (EPIC 2002).

Bruce Schneier; Applied Cryptography; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (New York, 1996); p. 126-127, p. 220-222, and generally.

Daniel J. Solove and Marc Rotenber; Information Privacy Law; Aspen Publishers (New York, 2003; p. 27-33 and generally.

Peter Wayner; Translucent Databases; Flyzone Press (Baltimore, 2002); p.13, p.  129-131, and generally.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC