[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] Interpretation of the CS under ballot
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Phillip H. Griffin wrote:As for (2), my interpretation is that ***CXER, and only CXER, must be used for encoding the WHOLE messages***, despite the numerous sentences such as "This value is always encoded using the XML Encoding Rules" and the numerous exampes of BASIC-XER encoding.Clearly, since CXER is a subset of XER, CXER may be used to encode entire messages. But this is not required. As you say above, there are numerous sentences in the document such as "This value is always encoded using the XML Encoding Rules" and it is these sentences that specify all of the CXER requirements.Doesn't this contradict what is said in the Introduction?: "These XML encodings are based on the ASN.1 [2] [3] [4] [5] schema defined in ANSI X9.84:2003 Biometric Information Management and Security. They conform to the canonical variant of the XML Encoding Rules (XER) for ASN.1 defined in ITU-T Rec. X.693" That is, in the Introduction it states that the encodings conform to CXER (the canonical variant of XER), but throughout the document there is a mixture of XER and CXER encodings. Bancroft
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]