Subject: Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approved the version 2 draft?
Phil, The question of the failed ballot was: "Do you accept this document to replace our current CS?" 58% of the members of the TC voted, and 71% of them voted YES. Therefore the ballot failed. Now you are saying that this document has "approval of 71% of the members". I don't quite understand. Can you please clarify the status of this "version 2 draft", and who has approved it? Alessandro > -----Original Message----- > From: Phillip H. Griffin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 23:10 > To: [OASIS XCBF] > Subject: [xcbf] XCBF CS 1.0 > > > The second automated TC ballot that closed on April 10, and > which was approved by 71% of the XCBF TC, has failed to > achieve the required super majority needed to approve this > document as the new XCBF CS. > > There were two votes to disapprove this document. These were > made by OSS Nokalva members Paul Thorpe and Alessandro > Triglia. Their comments are available for review in the member > area of the web site. > > I asked that the ballot be reviewed by OASIS administration. I > have been informed that the ballot failed to achieve the > required 2/3rds positive vote, and no more than 1/4th > negative votes needed to approve a new CS. So in this case, > the minority view prevails. > > I have changed the designation of the April 3 revised document > referenced in this ballot. It is now the XCBF version 2 draft > document. This document has approval of 71% of the members. > > I have restored to this folder the last document approved by the > XCBF TC as a CS. This document is dated March 25 and > designated as the XCBF CS 1.0. > > Phil > >