[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
Phillip H. Griffin wrote: > I'm trying to leave things tidy for the next chair. I am lost here. Do I get the impression you expect to be nominated for the next Chair? If so, why on earth did you rsign? Have there been other nominees? What is the process for requesting nominations? > We were unable to achieve 0% NO votes after putting your > VXER Why continue talking about VXER, that term was dropped a long time ago, as you know. > amendment in the document, and we were unable to > achieve 0% NO votes after taking it out. But given that the > affected parts of the XCBF are not even likely to ever be > used, this is far from an important technical issue. It is all that has blocked progression! John L