xcbf message

Subject: Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?

From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>
To: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:06:54 +0100

Phillip H. Griffin wrote:

> This term no longer appears in the last document proposed as an XCBF
> CS, which is now our current XCBF v 2.0 draft.

Ok.  So lets stop usng it in e-mail!

John L

References:
- Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approved the version 2 draft?
  - From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@oss.com>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>
- Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
  - From: "Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>