Subject: Re: [xcbf] Ballot failed, or new version started? Who has approvedthe version 2 draft?
*If* we get technical agreement in the group on where we are heading re Base64 and on what encoding rules are going to be used, I am sure I can sort out the text. But the agreement is essential. We can discuss how v2 (which I think Phil is keen on) should best be progressed at a later date. John L Bancroft Scott wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, John Larmouth wrote: > > >>Hm. Back to the drawying board on the Editor! Pity. Paul would have >>done a good job. > > > Do you have the bandwidth to do this, John? Note that Phil has already > done the vast majority of the work, and relatively little remains to be > done. > > Bancroft > > -- PLEASE NOTE - As an anti-SPAM measure, e-mails will shortly not be accepted by my machine from an unknown sender unless the subject contains the phrase "Hi John". If you pass my e-mail address to others (which I am very happy for you to do) please tell them to include this phrase in the subject line of their first mailing to me. Thanks. Prof John Larmouth Larmouth T&PDS Ltd (Training and Protocol Development Services Ltd) 1 Blueberry Road Bowdon email@example.com Cheshire WA14 3LS (put "Hi John" in subject) England Tel: +44 161 928 1605 Fax: +44 161 928 8069