[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] conference call outcome
John, I have spoken with Fernando four times about this topic (CBEFF alignment/profiling) since September. He has consistently said that he is in favor of fast tracking XCBF as long as it is aligned with Augmented CBEFF. Yes, I can do netmeeting. I am also willing to help with any OASIS procedural steps that are required as a prerequisite to doing the netmeeting. :-) Happy holidays... ~ Rick Randall randall_rick@bah.com 1-703-902-5388 John Larmouth wrote: > > (Not sure whether Bancroft and Paul and Olivier are still on the XCBF list, so > copied to them just in case.) > > Rick, > > Sorry I missed the meeting - I am afraid I plain forgot. > > I *think* I understand what the CBEFF alignment ("profiling") means, thanks to a > Chat with Alessandro. Clearly this can be done if we think it worth-while: > that is, if Fernando will accept and back the end-result; it is possible he is > using this as an excuse, and that further work will not advance the cause. > > If we are to proceed, we need to determine time-scales. It is unlikely that we > can have anything done in time for the Sydney input deadline (I am up to my > eyebrows with CBEFF, BIoAPI, ASN.1 OID stuff, and BIP that will take me well > into the New Year, but could probably have a document available by the Sydney > meeting. > > I guess we need to caucus with Fernando at that meeting if we are to proceed? > > Can you handle NetMeeting? I believe that a NetMeeting session with you, me and > and Alessandro (probably hosted by Paul Thorpe, because he is good at that!) and > possibly including Bancroft, who is good at deciding what is a good political > direction, might be the best way to proceed. > > John L > > Randall Rick wrote: > > > hello all, > > > > I apologize (again) to all for being an hour late to the conference > > call. I especially apologize to you, Dr. Larmouth. :-) > > > > Three of us joined the "hour late" version of the call just a few > > minutes ago: John Messing, Alessandro Triglia, and myself. We did not > > have a quorum, so no official actions could be taken. However, the > > informal consensus of the three of us on the call was that John Larmouth > > should be empowered to proceed with developing the "profiled" version of > > XCBF to bring XCBF into compliance with the current CD of the Augmented > > CBEFF spec going through SC37. (Perhaps we can formalize this with a > > XCBF TC vote on the OASIS web site?) > > > > > > Respectfully yours, > > > > ~ Rick Randall > > 703-902-5388 > > randall_rick@bah.com > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > > > > > > -- > Prof John Larmouth > Larmouth T&PDS Ltd > (Training and Protocol Development Services Ltd) > 1 Blueberry Road > Bowdon j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk > Cheshire WA14 3LS > England > Tel: +44 161 928 1605 Fax: +44 161 928 8069
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]