[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] SAML Liason
Yep. Given SAML's recent traction, it would be prudent of both XRI and XDI to strongly consider SAML when appropriate. --- peterd On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:29, Drummond Reed wrote: > Peter, thank you very much for taking on this role. With the growing > visibility of SAML, this will be a very important liaison for both the XRI > and XDI TCs. > > Please do make a post to either list or raise the topic in telecons when you > see a particularly strong point of synergy or something we could do to > enhance interoperability. > > =Drummond > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter C Davis [mailto:peter.davis@neustar.biz] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:31 AM > To: XDI TC > Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xri] SAML Liason > > I am now officially the liason to XRI/XDI for the SSTC (SAML). > Following some conversations I have had with DaveM and Drummond, I need > to compile a set of requests for: > > - XDI requirements of the SSTC > - XRI requirements of the SSTC > > > Similarly, once we get out of use-case mode, and start drafting > proposals, we need to consider where SAML can be leveraged within the > XDI protocol stack (if at all). Current thinking: > > - SAML Assertions for XRI resolution > - SAML Attribute Assertions for Data Exchange within the context of a > link contract > > among other potential areas... > > I will begin the process of folding in XRI requirements of the SSTC (as > these specs are complete), and accumulate XDI-related requirements as > they occur. > > If anyone has any XRI->SSTC requirements, please chime in! > > thanks > --- peterd > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave_workgroup.php > .
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]