[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xdi] URL claim in the Cardspace specifications
Gabe, I agree completely. Now that we know what
the actual claim (on the MS self-asserted card schema), the lack of sufficient
semantics to recognize that the value of the “webpage” claim is an OpenID
URL, let alone a XRI, is the first key issue I think we need to discuss with
Kim, Mike, Arun, and the CardSpace team. I’ll work with them to arrange a
meeting as soon as we can. =Drummond From: Gabe Wachob
[mailto:gabe.wachob@amsoft.net] Just because the “webpage”
slot takes a URI, that doesn’t mean to me that it should take an XRI
– an XRI identifies a person, concept, place, anything, whereas a webpage
is, well, a webpage, and nothing more. That being said, if that’s the
easiest way to stick in XRI’s, I guess we could use it. (the xri.net
version? The raw version?) I’m shocked that our friends at
Microsoft didn’t include a separate slot for an iname!!!! It will be
there in version 3, right? ;-)
-Gabe From: Drummond Reed
[mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] XRI & XDI TC members: In following up on Laurie’s and my
action item, we received the following clarification from Mike Jones and Arun
Nanda about the supported claims in Microsoft’s schema for self-asserted
CardSpace information cards. There is in fact a claim for a URL, referred to as
a “webpage” (last one on the list below). This should help us in our discussions of
XRIs both as claims identifiers and claims values. Thanks again to Laurie for her excellent
research on this topic, and to Paul for his help. =Drummond
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]