Re: [xdi] Proposed additional X3 representation format, or a replacement for X3 Whitespace

[Markus Sabadello <markus.sabadello@xdi.org>]

Hi Bill,

We have considered (and implemented) a JSON serialization format (called "XDI/JSON") before, you can see it at:
http://graceland.parityinc.net/xdi-converter/XDIConverter

The difference is that it explicitly puts artificial keys named "subjects", "predicates" and "references" into the JSON data structures.

But I think your approach is much better and definitely feels more natural to JSON people. The only artificial construct you are using is the "_context" key, but I think that's acceptable. So I'm all for deprecating the old "XDI/JSON" format and using your "X3J" format instead!

Markus

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Barnhill, William [USA] <barnhill_william@bah.com> wrote:

I've edited http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/X3Format to add text proposing an X3 representation that is directly in JSON as opposed to similar to JSON.  Given the broad adoption of JSON and the usefulness of this I'm seeing in my work I wanted to share it with the TC.  JSON format is still rough but works. I will add formatting rules section this weekend.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php