[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: More on the $has semantics and XDI metagraph model
Hello,
Thank you Drummond for these useful minutes. I have just one minor comment (below).
Kind Regards,
Giovanni
Def. Quota "Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@xdi.org>:
Giovanni said that he believes we need a semantic identifier for "Bill's
email" that is different than "Bill email".
Since this statement may sound a bit confusing... precisely I said that:
[2:00:38 PM] GB: I'd like to have =bill+email as the concept identifying
Bill's email, whereas I'd like to have (=bill/+email) as the subject
reifying the statement =bill/$has/+email
Continuing our talking on Friday, I explained that I believe that there are two concepts here:
1) (=bill/+email) is a subject representing the FACT asserting that Bill has a property, email (i.e. reification)
2) =bill+email is a subject representing the SET (or array, or collection, list, etc...) of all email instances belonging to Bill.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]